OIA

Invesco Muni Income Opps

Fundamental data last updated:April 13, 2026

We may earn a commission from partner links. This content is for informational purposes only and is not financial advice. Information may be delayed or inaccurate.

company profile

SECTOR

Financial Services

industry

Asset Management

Exchange

NYSE

County of HQ

United States

Next Earnings Date

Business Summary

OIA Invesco Muni Income Opps operates as a publicly traded asset management vehicle focused on municipal income strategies, generating cash primarily through portfolio income and management of fixed-income securities. Revenue and distributable income are driven by interest income from municipal bonds and capital allocation decisions within the portfolio. Its competitive positioning depends on credit selection, duration management, and the reputation and distribution strength of its sponsor platform. The moat, if any, lies in disciplined portfolio construction and investor demand for tax-advantaged income rather than proprietary technology or structural barriers to entry.

 


Analyze OIA on TradingView

VALUATION

P/E

-

Market Cap ($M USD)

$294

Forward P/E

-

PEG

-

PRICE TO SALES

-

PRICE TO BOOK

1.1

EV / EBITDA

-

5-Year Average P/E

Free Cash Flow Yield

DCF Value

Graham Number

Price to FCF

EV to FCF

Earnings Yield

FCF Yield

DIVIDEND

Yield

5.70%

Annual Payout

$0.35

Payout Ratio

-

Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth

-

5-Year Dividend Growth Rate

-1.60%

Financial Health & Profitability

Earnings Per Share

-$0.31

Next Year EPS Growth Estimate

-

Next Year Revenue Growth Estimate

-

Return on Equity (ROE)

-5.20%

FREE CASH FLOW

Operating Margin

-

Debt-to-Equity

0.5

Piotroski F-Score

-

Altman Z-Score

-

Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)

-2.40%

Current Ratio

-

Quick Ratio

Net Debt to EBITDA

Interest Coverage

Gross Profit margin

FCF PER SHARE

REVENUE PER SHARE

Analyze OIA on TradingView

Gainseekers Quantitative Analysis

Summary

This is a $294M micro-cap asset management vehicle trading at 1.1x book with negative operating margin of -5.20% and ROIC of -2.40%, which immediately frames it as capital-destructive rather than compounding. There is no P/E, no Forward P/E, and no Altman Z-Score provided, meaning we have zero visibility into earnings power or balance sheet distress risk from the supplied data. With EPS next year estimated at -$0.31 and no sales growth guidance, the market is not pricing in growth — it’s pricing in stagnation or erosion. At face value, this is not a growth story and not a quality compounder; it is a thinly capitalized income vehicle with weak profitability metrics and unclear forward visibility.

AI Exposure / Tech Reliance

As an Asset Management vehicle within Financial Services, its resilience to AI disruption is moderate at best. Portfolio management and distribution can be augmented by AI-driven analytics, but core performance still hinges on capital allocation and market cycles. There is no data here suggesting differentiated tech capability or operating leverage from digital transformation.

The Bull Case

A deep value investor could argue that 1.1x price-to-book for a publicly traded muni income-focused vehicle is not demanding, particularly if underlying assets are stable and marked close to NAV. The TTM yield of 0.5 and a stated dividend metric of 5.70% may attract income-focused mandates seeking tax-advantaged exposure, and the short interest of -1.60% suggests no aggressive bearish positioning. If operating margin normalizes from -5.20% and ROIC improves from -2.40%, even modest efficiency gains could materially re-rate a $294M market cap structure. In a benign credit environment, asset managers with discounted book multiples can mean-revert quickly.

The Bear Case

The bear case is straightforward: negative operating margin (-5.20%), negative ROIC (-2.40%), and projected EPS of -$0.31 next year define a business currently destroying value. There is no PEG ratio, no Forward P/E, no Debt/Equity data, and no Altman Z-Score provided, which removes critical analytical guardrails around leverage and solvency. The absence of profitability metrics combined with negative forward earnings expectations makes this structurally unattractive for GARP investors. Without growth, margin strength, or demonstrated capital efficiency, the 1.1x book multiple is not obviously cheap — it may simply reflect mediocre asset quality and weak earnings power.

Market Sentiment & Smart Money

Short Interest %

-

Analyst Consensus

-

Average Analyst Price Target

-

Institutional Ownership %

-

1-Year Beta

0.15

Insider Buying % (6 Mo)

-%

Distance to 52-Week High

96.40%

Distance to 52-Week Low

112.00%

EARNINGS SURPRISE %

50-DAY SMA

200-DAY SMA

⚠️ Financial Disclaimer:
This content is for informational purposes only and is not financial advice. Information may be delayed or inaccurate. We may earn a commission from partner links.