BATRA

Atlanta Braves Holdings

Fundamental data last updated:April 13, 2026

We may earn a commission from partner links. This content is for informational purposes only and is not financial advice. Information may be delayed or inaccurate.

company profile

SECTOR

Communication Services

industry

Entertainment

Exchange

Nasdaq

County of HQ

United States

Next Earnings Date

05/11/26

Business Summary

THG operates as a Property & Casualty insurer, generating revenue by underwriting risk and collecting premiums that exceed long-term claims and operating expenses. Cash flow is driven by disciplined pricing, portfolio diversification, and investment income on premium float. Its moat lies in underwriting expertise, broker relationships, and risk selection data that compound over time, creating informational advantages. The durability of the model depends on maintaining pricing power and claims efficiency, turning scale and actuarial precision into consistent operating margins.

 


VALUATION

P/E

-

Market Cap ($M USD)

$2,907

Forward P/E

-

PEG

-

PRICE TO SALES

4.3

PRICE TO BOOK

6

EV / EBITDA

37.2

5-Year Average P/E

Free Cash Flow Yield

DCF Value

Graham Number

Price to FCF

EV to FCF

Earnings Yield

FCF Yield

DIVIDEND

Yield

-

Annual Payout

-

Payout Ratio

-

Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth

0

5-Year Dividend Growth Rate

-

Financial Health & Profitability

Earnings Per Share

-$0.37

Next Year EPS Growth Estimate

-

Next Year Revenue Growth Estimate

4.70%

Return on Equity (ROE)

-4.40%

FREE CASH FLOW

Operating Margin

2.30%

Debt-to-Equity

1.6

Piotroski F-Score

5

Altman Z-Score

1.4

Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)

1.70%

Current Ratio

0.4

Quick Ratio

Net Debt to EBITDA

Interest Coverage

Gross Profit margin

FCF PER SHARE

REVENUE PER SHARE

Gainseekers Quantitative Analysis

Summary

At a $2,907M market cap with a Price/Sales of 4.3 and Price/Book of 6, BATRA is not trading like a distressed asset—yet the balance sheet and profitability profile suggest stress. The absence of a P/E and Forward P/E combined with a projected EPS Next Year of -$0.37 signals an earnings air pocket ahead, while the Altman Z-Score of 1.4 places the company firmly in financial distress territory. Operating Margin of -4.40%, ROIC of 1.70%, and a Current Ratio of 0.4 reinforce liquidity and efficiency concerns. This is not a growth-at-a-reasonable-price setup; it is a leverage-heavy, low-return business being priced on asset scarcity and franchise value rather than earnings durability.

As an Entertainment company within Communication Services, its resilience to AI disruption is moderate at best. Live sports content remains one of the few categories with pricing power and real-time demand, which offers some insulation from commoditization. However, monetization increasingly depends on digital distribution, data analytics, and streaming economics, where scale and platform leverage matter significantly.

A value-oriented investor could argue that institutional ownership of 59.67% reflects informed capital anchoring the name, while a Piotroski F-Score of 5 indicates operational stability rather than collapse. The 1.6% TTM yield provides some tangible shareholder return, and positive EPS of 37.2 shows the company is capable of generating accounting profitability in certain cycles. With Return on Equity at 4.70%, the business is at least generating a positive spread above zero, and in asset-backed franchises scarcity value can matter more than margins. If margins normalize from the current -4.40% operating level, even modest improvement could create operating leverage given the existing revenue base implied by a 4.3 Price/Sales ratio.

The bear case is materially stronger. Debt/Equity of 2.30% (as provided) paired with a Current Ratio of 0.4 signals tight liquidity, and the Altman Z-Score of 1.4 flags elevated bankruptcy risk. ROIC of 1.70% is weak, meaning capital is barely compounding, and negative expected EPS next year eliminates any credible near-term growth narrative. Sales Growth Next Year is not provided, PEG Forward is absent, and Forward P/E is unavailable—this opacity alone is problematic for a GARP framework. Operating Margin at -4.40% combined with low returns suggests structural inefficiency rather than temporary cyclicality.

United States

Atlanta Braves Holdings generates cash primarily through ownership of a Major League Baseball franchise and its associated real estate and media rights ecosystem. Revenue streams typically include broadcasting rights, ticket sales, sponsorships, concessions, and mixed-use development income tied to stadium-adjacent assets. The moat is rooted in scarcity—there are a limited number of MLB franchises—and in long-term media contracts that create relatively predictable revenue layers. However, cash generation ultimately depends on attendance, media monetization, and disciplined cost control, making operating leverage both a weapon and a vulnerability.

AI Exposure / Tech Reliance

As a Property & Casualty insurer in the Financial Services sector, THG’s ability to leverage AI centers on underwriting precision, claims automation, and fraud detection efficiency. Operating Margin of 18.60% indicates room to benefit from incremental tech-driven cost reductions. In a data-driven insurance industry, tech adaptation directly influences loss ratios and pricing accuracy, making modernization a margin lever rather than a speculative bet.

The Bull Case

A value or GARP investor buys this because the math is straightforward: P/E of 9.8, Price/Sales of 1, and Price/Book of 1.7 combined with a 14.70% ROIC create a classic quality-at-a-reasonable-price profile. Operating Margin at 18.60% demonstrates underwriting discipline, while EPS projected to jump to $18.46 gives the Forward P/E real teeth if realized. Institutional Ownership listed at $198.00 signals serious capital involvement, and a 2.10% dividend per share with a 10+% five-year average dividend growth rate adds a capital return layer. Even with a Piotroski F-Score of 4 indicating only moderate financial strength, the earnings power relative to valuation is compelling enough for institutional value accumulation.

The Bear Case

The red flags are not subtle. A Piotroski F-Score of 4 signals mediocre financial health, and ROE of 4.10% is weak relative to the 14.70% ROIC, suggesting capital structure inefficiency or earnings volatility. Short interest at 6.30% of float is not trivial and reflects skepticism, while the PEG Forward of 1 indicates the stock is fairly valued, not deeply discounted on growth. The lack of disclosed Debt/Equity and Altman Z-Score removes visibility into balance sheet resilience, and consensus figures listed at 2.70% with a Mean Consensus Target Price of 2.1 provide little conviction from analysts—this is not a screaming turnaround, it’s a cautiously priced insurer with structural opacity.

Market Sentiment & Smart Money

Short Interest %

5.20%

Analyst Consensus

1.5

Average Analyst Price Target

$59.67

Institutional Ownership %

76.20%

1-Year Beta

0.4

Insider Buying % (6 Mo)

5.40%%

Distance to 52-Week High

97.20%

Distance to 52-Week Low

118.30%

EARNINGS SURPRISE %

50-DAY SMA

200-DAY SMA

⚠️ Financial Disclaimer:
This content is for informational purposes only and is not financial advice. Information may be delayed or inaccurate. We may earn a commission from partner links.